UFO Sighting in Hong Kong, China on July 30, 2011 of fleet of orbs over city, video.







Date of sighting: July 30, 2011
Location of sighting: Hong Kong, China

He states that it is 11PM and he is at the Kwa Wan Lok Man Sun Chuan Block, near Kuanyin Mountain.






☯ Scott C. Waring wrote “UFO Sightings of 2006-2009” and "Dragons of Asgard." ☯

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

UFO Sighting over Hawaii of two objects leaving Earth's atmosphere into space, video.










Date of sighting: July 29, 2011
Location of sighting: Mauna Kea, Hawaii, Telescope










At :22 seconds into the video you see several UFO shoot past diagonally and upward into space. These are not orbiting earth, but leaving our atmosphere heading into space (noted by the angles). The second nice one is at :33 seconds into the video.

Awesome video, I am sure some debunkers will call them meteorites heading from earth into space. LOL

The CFH observatory hosts a world-class, 3.6 meter optical/infrared telescope. The observatory is located atop the summit of Mauna Kea, a 4200 meter, dormant volcano located on the island of Hawaii.







☯ Scott C. Waring wrote “UFO Sightings of 2006-2009” and "Dragons of Asgard." ☯

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

What Are Orbs? In Depth Explanation of These Energy Beings, UFO Sighting and Paranormal News.




I get this question a lot on our UFO site, what are orbs? I thought this young lady did a great job at explaining it. Although there are two types, the energy and the solid UFO probes. She focuses on the first. SCW






They state:
"This is a video about orbs that are energy beings. The consensus is that small orbs take up the least amount of energy and apparitions and other fuller shapes take up the most.In the colder parts of the year,it seems that ghosts tends to find it easierto take on shapes other than orbs. That's when there is the most static electricity in the atmosphere. Those months being October through February. It is also believed that they are able to draw on our own energy."








☯ Scott C. Waring wrote “UFO Sightings of 2006-2009” and "Dragons of Asgard." ☯

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Two UFO Sightings This Month of Square Craft In Clouds, Nova Scotia and Hawaii, News Video.

Two UFO Sightings This Month of Square Craft In Clouds, Nova Scotia and Hawaii, News Video.








Dates & Locations of sightings: July 16, 2011 at Nova Scotia, Waikiki, Hawaii on July 23, 2011

Looking at this video shows us that the same object was in two different locations at different times. If you remember the Chicago, O'hare Airport UFO incident, then you will remember that after the UFO was watched by hundreds of witnesses and recorded by a few including a pilot, the UFO then shot straight up and through the clouds above it, leaving a large round hole in the cloud (i.e. 90+page MUFON report). These holes could have been made that way or they could actually be cloaked UFOs in the clouds. Hard to say but a great video and discovery by Shielaaliens of Youtube!!! Bravo!!!






☯ Scott C. Waring wrote “UFO Sightings of 2006-2009” and "Dragons of Asgard." ☯

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Opinion: The Obama Recession Is Worse Than You Think

The Obama Recession has now earned the right of being compared to the Great Depression.



From the instant that President Barack Hussein Obama, D-Kenya, came into office, there have been absolutely no net gains in full-time jobs



This is contrary to what had happened in all our prior recessions. Employers are not recalling the workers they laid off from full-time employment.





The Obama policies have created permanent job losses.



Despite trillions spent on "stimulus" and the continuous devaluation of our currency, we have experienced the loss of over 7 million jobs, wiping out every job gained since the year 2000.



The real job losses are far greater than the government estimate of 7.5 million. They are much closer to 10.5 million, as 3 million people have stopped looking for work.



The Obama Administration routinely under reports our real rate of unemployment. So they can pretend there is some kind of "recovery" going on, despite more people being unemployed.



Equally troublesome is the lower labor participation rate; some 5 million jobs have vanished from manufacturing, long America's greatest strength.



We have 131 million employed, but this is lower than it was at the beginning of the year 2000, even though our population has grown by nearly 30 million.



We currently have had nine straight weeks where new unemployment claims are over 400,000. If this is a "recovery" then it certainly is an odd one. A recovery in which you keep losing more jobs!



Today, over 14 million people are unemployed. 



We now have more idle men and women than at any time since the Great Depression. Nearly seven people in the labor pool compete for every job opening. The most startling statistic is that one fifth of all men of prime working age are not getting up and going to work. You read that correctly.. One in five men wake up each morning and have no job to go to.



Don't pay too much attention to the headline unemployment rate of 9.1 percent. It is scary enough, but it is a gloss on the reality.



These numbers do not include the millions who have stopped looking for a job or who are working part time but would work full time if a position were available.



And they count only those people who have actively applied for a job within the last four weeks.



Include those others and the real number is a nasty 16 percent. The 16 percent includes 8.5 million part-timers who want to work full time (which is double the historical norm) and those who have applied for a job within the last six months, including many of the long-term unemployed. And this 16 percent does not take into account the discouraged workers who have left the labor force.



We have an economic crisis, and the President vacations.



In past recessions, the economy recovered lost jobs within 13 months, on average, after the trough.



Twenty-three months into a recovery, employment typically increases by around 174,000 jobs monthly, compared to 54,000 this time around. In a typical recovery, we would have had several hundred thousand more hires per month than we are seeing now. Businesses do not seem to have the confidence or the incentive to add staff but prefer to continue the deep cost-cutting they undertook from the onset of the recession.



How is the President responding to this? Well, he doesn't seem to notice it.



He goes on vacations, he plays golf, and he throws lavish fund raisers at the White House as he courts more corporate sponsors for his reelection war chest.



But even worse, he demonizes anyone who dares to suggest that we need to get back on track with sound fiscal policies.



And he gets help from the left leaning media, who shameless shill for him and who spin all bad economic news into signs that "the recovery is going well."



Make no mistake about it. While a large portion of our population is suffering, a small group is benefiting greatly from these Obama economic policies. Namely.... the banks, Wall Street, the money traders, and mostly those huge global corporations who donate generously to President Obama and his party (GE, AIG, Goldman Sachs, Google, JPMorgan, Microsoft, etc).



Last year, when most people either lost money or made small gains on their investments, Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, made a 62% profit on her investments. No one on Capital Hill is suffering, even though most of the rest of us are.



Our political leadership in both Congress and the White House will pay a very high price for their failure to deal with our economic problems effectively. Borrowing more money and throwing it into the stimulus pit isn't working. The voters just might hold them accountable in next year's election.




  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Why public schools are in so much trouble...

This video speaks for itself.



There is absolutely no need to say any more. Just watch this video, and be amazed. This will also help explain why President Barack Hussein Obama, D-Kenya, still gets a 44% approval rating, despite having failed miserably at his job....







  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Profiles in Stupidity: Senator Claire McCaskill

This is the seventh installment of "Profiles in Stupidity" in which we  highlight the dumbest politicians in America today.



Claire McCaskill is the senior United States Senator from Missouri and a member of the Democratic Party.



She defeated Republican incumbent Jim Talent in the 2006 U.S. Senate election. She is the first woman elected to the Senate from Missouri in her own right.



She became Missouri's senior Senator upon the retirement of Kit Bond in 2011.



Here are some examples of how completely inane this poor excuse for a senator is:



On Feb 3, 2009, immediately after voting to give Wall Street firms over $350 billion in taxpayer funded bail outs, and then finding out they spent $18 billion of their prior bailout to give themselves bonuses, Ms. McCaskill said on the floor of the Senate:

“We have a bunch of idiots on Wall Street that are kicking sand in the face of the American taxpayer. They don’t get it. These people are idiots."
So why did McCaskill vote to give them all that free money? Then she later voted to give them even more! If she doesn't like them taking our money, then paying themselves big bonuses with it, why has she given them a third of a trillion dollars? Her solution to this? Cap their salaries, of course!



On Nov 17, 2010, upon hearing that the TSA was going to start using very invasive, and widely opposed X-Ray method to scan passengers, Ms. McCaskill said:
"I'm wildly excited that I can walk through a machine instead of getting my dose of love pats."
Senator Claire McCaskill  called the pat-downs “love pats.”  The pilot’s union has described them as “sexual assault.” This just shows you what a World Class Idiot this woman is.



On March 16, 2011, McCaskill told reporters that she:

"was embarrassed about revelations that her office had billed taxpayers for the senator's use of a private airplane she co-owns with her husband and friends."
According to a government audit, the plane was used for 90 flights taken between Washington D.C. and her home in suburban St. Louis, as well as to numerous sites around the state of Missouri.



As soon as the story broke, Senator McCaskill sent a check for $88,000 to the U.S. Treasury to return the reimbursement for the flights.



But that wasn't the end of it. That $88,000 was just the tip of the iceberg. At first, McCaskill tried to use the "John Kerry Defense" of saying the plane was purchased in Delaware, so she shouldn't have to pay property tax in Missouri on it, but when that wouldn't hold water, she said:

“I have convinced my husband to sell the damn plane, I will never set foot on the plane again.”
On March 21, 2011 it was discovered that McCaskill had failed to pay over $280,000 of taxes on the plane and was planning to sell it.




  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

We could call today "Dependence Day"

The Spin Cycle has joined a group of conservative bloggers who have formed The Right Blogfest. On some special occasions we will all write a post on the same topic, with each one of us providing our own unique viewpoint.



We are proud to join Two Sisters From The Right,  Raised On Hoecakes,  Steve Bussey.com and Patriot's Corner in this project. 



We invite you to visit the other blogs for their own perspective on the topic at hand. 





Today is July 4th, and is known as Independence Day in the USA. 



Independence Day, commonly known as the Fourth of July, is a federal holiday in the United States commemorating the adoption of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, declaring independence from Great Britain.



Independence Day is celebrated with fireworks, parades, barbecues, carnivals, fairs, picnics, concerts, baseball games, family reunions, political speeches and ceremonies, and various other public and private events celebrating the history, government, and traditions of the United States.



But how independent are we today?



Certainly a lot less than we were 235 years ago. While we were self sufficient and a major exporter of goods in 1776, today we import a great deal of our essential needs:



98% of our clothing

80% of our prescription drugs

79% of the fish and shellfish we ea

75% of all furniture sold in the USA

71% of our high tech products

65% of our crude oil

43% of our cars

22% of our finished steel

15% of our food



And a staggering number of us depend on government benefits today. And none of these things even existed prior to 1936. In fact, a record number of Americans are currently working for the government!



58,000,000 Americans rely on Medicaid

54,000,000 Americans receive Social Security

45,000,000 Americans are on Medicare

43,000,000 Americans collect food stamps

25,000,000 Americans have government jobs

  5,000,000 Americans collect AFDC



We have come a very long way since the Declaration of Independence was signed.



Not only are we dependent on foreign nations to provide us with essential commodities, but now a sizable number of our workforce is working for some government agency. Some of those jobs are important ones, like soldiers, police, firefighters and teachers... but an awful lot of them are just administrators. People who shuffle papers around, and manage these huge bureacracies.



For example, President Barack Hussein Obama, D-Kenya, has a staff of 454 people working for him at the White House. They are paid between $41,000 and $172,200 a year, with a great many getting the top rate. This works out to a White House payroll of over $38 million, not including benefits. And their benefits are pretty darn good, too.



The bottom line is... the more goods we need to import, and the more people we have working for government the weaker our nation becomes. When we celebrate "Independence" we might be celebrating something we once had, but don't have today.




  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Obama's Stimulus Plan Has Cost $278,000 per job!

"I really thought it would work. Honest, I did"
Washington DC, Jul 5, 2011. Last Friday the President's own Council of Economic Advisors  released their “Seventh Quarterly Report” on the economic impact of the the Presidnet's stimulus plan.



Their report provided further evidence that President Barack Hussein Obama’s, D-Kenya, economic stimulus did very little, if anything, to stimulate the economy.



However, it did accomplish a whole lot to stimulate the national debt.



The report was written by the White House’s Council of Economic Advisors, a group of three economists who were all handpicked by President Obama, and it chronicles the alleged success of the “stimulus” in adding or saving jobs. 


The council reports that, using “mainstream estimates of economic multipliers for the effects of fiscal stimulus” (which it describes as a “natural way to estimate the effects of” the legislation), the “stimulus” has added or saved just under 2.4 million jobs, whether private or public, at a cost (to date) of $666 billion. That’s a cost to taxpayers of $278,000 per job.


There were no "shovel ready jobs"


In other words, the government could simply have cut a $100,000 check to everyone whose employment was allegedly made possible by the “stimulus,” and taxpayers would have come out $427 billion ahead.



Now remember, this is counting all those mysterious "jobs saved" too. No one understands how the President justifies this statistic. Some say he just pulls it out of thin air.



But even if we could all those mythical "jobs were saved" then each one of them cost us $278,000.

 .



Again, this is the verdict of Obama’s own Council of Economic Advisors, which is about as much of a home-field ruling as anyone could ever ask for.



In reality, it’s very possible that by borrowing an amount greater than the entire federal budget was a few years ago, and then spending it mostly on Democrati Party pet projects rather than in a manner genuinely designed to stimulate the economy, Obama’s “stimulus” has actually undermined the economy’s recovery, while leaving us $666 billion deeper in debt. And the debt keeps mounting higher each day!



"I''ll try harder in my next term"
The actual employment numbers from the administration’s own Bureau of Labor Statistics show that the unemployment rate was 7.3 percent when the “stimulus” was being debated.



It has since risen to 9.1 percent. Meanwhile, the national debt at the end of 2008, when Obama was poised to take office, was $9.986 trillion. It’s now $14.467 trillion, and counting.



All sides agree on these incriminating numbers — and now they also appear to agree on this important point: The economy would now be generating job growth at a faster rate if the Democrats hadn’t passed their stimulus plan.




  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments

Communist Party-USA Endorses Barack Obama Again

Washington DC, Jul 6, 2011. For the second time in two consequetive elections the Communist Party USA has decided to support Barack Hussein Obama, D-Kenya, and to not run a candidate of their own.



CPUSA leader, Sam Webb, says he will continue to support Obama and Democrats in 2012.



The Communist Party USA has consistently supported and infiltrated the Democratic Party. The CPUSA has not run their own candidate for President since 1984.



That was the year they felt their ticket of Gus Hall and Angela Davis took votes away from Walter Mondale, and might have helped Ronald Reagan win. Ever since then, they have simply endorsed the Democrat, saying "he is close enough to what we want, an he has a real chance to win."



Sam Webb, the leader of the party, called Obama a friend back in 2008. 

"The left can and should advance its own views and disagree with the Obama administration without being disagreeable. Its tone should be respectful. We are speaking to a friend."
To be fair about it, the Communist Party does have some very minor differences with the Democrat Party. But these are generally differences on very insignificant issues, and they feel they are better off endorsing a Democrat who has a real chance to win, rather than running their own candidate who will always lose.



On the important issues, like socializing American industry, weakening our military,  and expanding the role of government in our lives, the Communists and the Democrats are in lockstep agreement.

 

In fact, the Democrats have swung so far to the left in recent times, that the CPUSA has become largely redundant and unnecessary. This is a common occurrence in American history.



Third parties rarely win elections, but their platforms are frequently adopted by one of the major two parties instead.



And this is precisely what has happened here. This is why we have so many third parties running in elections where they have absolutely no hope to win. They want their policies adopted by one of the major parties.



The main question from a strategic point of view for the Communists is this: Does it make any difference, from the standpoint of the class and democratic struggles, which party gains political ascendency? As long as they get the policies they want enacted into law, then it really doesn't matter who wins an election.



Neither party is anti-capitalist, but they aren’t identical either. Differences exist at the levels of policy and social composition. But despite their minor differences with the Democrats over past three years, the CPUSA is genuinely thrilled about the hard left direction President Obama has taken the nation in.

Sam Webb wants Barack Obama reelected in 2012
CPUSA Leader Sam Webb tells us:

"We are keenly aware of the fact that the agenda of the far right is to bring this administration and country to its knees, with a heavy dose of racism"
The CPUSA is just doing whatever it can pragmatically do to defeat Republicans and advance their radical left agenda. And for them this usually means "endorsing the Democrat candidates."




  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS
Read Comments